The Supreme Court’s Bhushan Steel judgment exposes serious lapses in India’s insolvency framework, from procedural violations to CoC oversight failures. Our analysis unpacks key lessons, judicial intervention limits, and urgent IBBI reforms needed to restore transparency, accountability, and efficiency in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).
In an era of deepfakes, AI clones, and viral impersonations, personality rights in India have taken center stage. This article unpacks the legal landscape surrounding the right to privacy and publicity, explores landmark judgments involving Indian celebrities, and examines how existing laws from constitutional protections to IP statutes are being interpreted to safeguard individual identity in the digital age.
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Vijaya Bank v. Prashant B. Narnaware clarifies the legality of employment bonds in India. It holds that such bonds are enforceable when tied to valid employment agreements, limited to the period of employment, and supported by reasonable liquidated damages. The judgment offers critical guidance on balancing employer interests with constitutional and contractual protections.
As sustainability goals reshape global markets, India’s competition law must evolve to keep pace. This article explores the intersection of environmental imperatives and antitrust principles, highlighting the need to accommodate green collaborations within the Competition Act, 2002. Drawing lessons from international jurisdictions, it outlines a policy roadmap to ensure India’s markets remain both competitive and climate-conscious.
India is facing a rising student suicide crisis driven by academic pressure, discrimination, and systemic neglect. A landmark Supreme Court judgment has spotlighted institutional responsibility and caste-based bias. This article explores legal reforms, mental health gaps, and global models to build safer, inclusive campuses urging urgent action to address the root causes behind student suicides in India’s higher education system.
As India navigates the digital age, the question of protecting minors online grows more urgent. With the DPDP Act mandating parental consent but setting no clear minimum age for social media, this article explores the legal, ethical, and technological challenges of ensuring child safety online. It unpacks India’s evolving regulatory approach, global comparisons, and what platforms must do to comply — without compromising user privacy.
India’s new data protection law signals a major shift in how minors engage with social media. With mandatory parental consent, unclear age thresholds, and enforcement gaps, the DPDP framework walks a tightrope between child safety and digital rights. This article explores the policy tensions, global comparisons, and the urgent need for clarity in protecting young users online.
The Supreme Court’s landmark verdict in CORE-II (2024) redefines the legality of unilateral arbitrator appointments, challenging long-standing practices in PSU and government contracts. This article unpacks the evolving judicial stance, key precedents, and the shifting policy landscape of arbitration in India.
India’s Draft DPDP Rules, 2025 outline how the DPDP Act will be enforced. This piece highlights key compliance features, rights of individuals, and major regulatory gaps.
Twelve years after the POSH Act’s enactment, gaps in procedural clarity and inconsistent ICC practices still hinder justice. This article explores key rulings, implementation lapses, and what must change to make workplaces safer for women.